William the Conqueror

A short, broad-shouldered northern Frenchman, approaching his fortieth year, a man with long arms, powerfully built, and famous for the strength of his hands, clean-shaven, square jawed, obese, vigorous-all that-decided, at about five o'clock of an autumn evening,the destinies of England and, in great part, of the the world. (Pg 1) In William the Conqueror, the great Catholic historian Hilaire Belloc describes everything that led up to and followed from the momentous battle which took place at Hastings in England in the year 1066 A.D. - an event which was to have a profound effect on the whole of Europe from that time forward - and eventually upon the world. Belloc shows that the Conquest of England which began with William's victory at Hastings should not rightly be called a conquest in our sense of the word-nor can the great Duke William of Normandy be styled a Conqueror in the usual understanding. For William had crossed the Channel to England as one enforcing a rightful claim. Moreover, the ties between England and French Normandy on the Continent had long been very close-ties of blood, of marriage, of rule, of culture and of the Catholic Faith. For several lifetimes previous-as Belloc details-England had been undergoing an internal struggle between, on the one hand, the half-Christianised Danes, with their smoldering traditions of cruelty, and on the other hand, English and Norman Chris-tians, whose civilization was epitomized in the gentle, enlightened rule of St. Edward the Confessor (1043-1066) and who were the bearers of the ancient Christian and Roman civilization. With William's conquest, the latter side won out. England was hence forth to be knit ever the more closely into the unity of European Christian civilisation, not a political unity, but a unity of culture and civilisation, of which the soul was the Catholic Faith.

Additional Information